Skip to content

Poissons Ratio

Material mechanics

Poisson’s ratio, and why metal gets thinner when you pull it

Stretch a rubber band and it gets longer. It also gets thinner — and you already knew that without being told. Poisson’s ratio is just the number that says how much thinner.

Poisson’s ratio — step through it

The one equation

Strain is simply how much something changed, divided by how big it was to start with. Pull a 100 mm bar to 101 mm and the longitudinal strain is 0.01.

ν = − ( lateral strain / longitudinal strain )

ν (nu) = Poisson’s ratio · lateral = across · longitudinal = along the pull

Why the minus sign? By convention, stretching is positive and shrinking is negative. When you pull a bar, the length grows (+) and the width shrinks (−). Dividing one by the other gives a negative answer, so the minus sign flips it back to positive. It exists purely so that ordinary materials have a positive Poisson’s ratio. Nothing deeper than that.

Typical values

Poisson’s ratio has no units — it is a plain number, and for almost every real material it sits between 0 and 0.5.

Material ν What that means in practice
Cork ~0.0 Barely spreads when squeezed. Precisely why it goes into a wine bottle and stays there.
Steel 0.27 – 0.30 The working range for most structural and sheet steels.
Stainless 304 ~0.29 Close to carbon steel.
Aluminium ~0.33 Spreads more than steel for the same squeeze.
Copper ~0.34 Similar to aluminium.
Concrete 0.1 – 0.2 Low. Part of why it behaves so differently from metal.
Rubber ~0.4999 Effectively incompressible — squeeze it and the volume barely changes, it just moves.
0.5 is the ceiling, and it means something specific. A material at exactly 0.5 does not change volume at all when you deform it. Rubber is very close. Metals are nowhere near, which is why a bent metal part really does end up with slightly less material in the outer fibre than it started with.

Where this touches sheet metal

Bend a strip and the outside of the bend has further to travel than the inside. The outer fibre stretches, and because of Poisson’s effect it thins. The inner fibre compresses, and it thickens.

Between them is a layer that does neither — the neutral axis. It never sits exactly in the middle. It shifts toward the inside of the bend, and it shifts further as the radius gets tighter.

That shift is what the K-factor measures. K is simply the neutral axis position as a fraction of material thickness. When you use our bend allowance calculator and it tells you K is 0.42, it is telling you the neutral axis sits 42% of the way in from the inside surface — and Poisson’s ratio is part of the reason it is there rather than at 0.5.

It also explains a failure you have probably seen. On a very tight bend, the outer fibre thins so much that it cracks. That is not bad steel. It is the material running out of ability to stretch, and it is why minimum bend radius exists as a rule at all.

The honest limits

Everything above assumes an isotropic material — one that behaves the same in every direction. Rolled sheet is not truly isotropic. Grain direction matters, which is why bending along the rolling direction behaves differently from bending across it.

These figures also describe elastic behaviour, the deformation a material recovers from. Bending takes metal well past that point into plastic deformation, where the relationships get more complicated. Poisson’s ratio explains why the thinning happens; it will not tell you exactly how much on a real press brake.